Comments are closed.
This, That & The Other (Reprise)
July 22nd, 2010
This
I spent today in London at the Houses Of Parliament. Steve Barclay MP secured tickets for my mother and I to go see Prime Minister’s Questions – but since the Prime Minister was out of the country it fell to Nick Clegg to face the Wrath Of Khan Jack Straw. I have to grudgingly admit to my Liberal Democrat pals that Nick was on fire – his verbal dexterity beat the living tar out of a struggling and blustering Jack while barely breaking a sweat himself. The Labour herd, moo-ing and jeering as best they were able, still didn’t manage to change the end result. In fact, i’m not sure Straw scored even a single hit on the Deputy In Yellow.
The fact is – although I enjoyed Nick Clegg’s responses very much (and so did everybody else in the gallery) there was no need for him to reply at all. As I remarked to my Mum, he could have just as easily raised a little placard that had the words: “You spent all the money” on it and waved it at the opposition after every question. Why have you cut this thing? You spent all the money. Why are you cutting that thing? You spent all the money. Why are you doing this horrible, disastrous thing that will end the world as we know it? You spent all the money. What makes the response so powerful, so difficult to challenge, is that its absolutely right and (mostly) everybody knows it. Everybody who isn’t Labour, anyway. They are still living in denial.
Steve Barclay managed to squeeze some time between meetings to show us around the House on a whirlwind tour. I’ve never been before so this was really quite exhilerating for me. And while anything I say or describe could not possibly do justice to the incredible grandeur and historic elegance that is our seat of government I would make one simple comment that sums it up nicely for me : In the United Kingdom we know how to do ceremony, don’t we? We understand that celebrating our long and colourful history and keeping our breathtaking buildings in excellent order adds infinite gravity to all that goes on there. What an amazing place.
That
I caught on the news today that a court in Israel has just convicted a man of a crime called: “Deception Rape.” What the man did was lie in order to talk a young lady into having ”personal relations” with him. The act itself was entirely consensual and neither party denies that at all. A newspaper explains that she is unhappy because in their brief courtship he told her he was Jewish, but in fact turned out to be a Palestinian. He also told her that he wanted a “committed relationship” and then left before she had even gotten dressed. The court agreed that this was a serious crime, found him guilty of a form of rape and gave him a custodial sentence.
The guy was clearly what we’d have called a “cad” in the old days or what might now be called a “player” by people who have forgotten that there are actually nice ways for men and women to treat one another. Liars of this kind are what mums and dads warn their daughters about all over the world. But are Israel serious in setting a precedent that engaging in some sort of deception during seduction means that a person can be tried for rape?
This seems a very bad idea to me. Rape is one of the most serious of all crimes – a violent, horrific, terrible act and to compare it to any completely consensual pairing between adults is an insult to those people who have been its tragic victims.
Thinking back to my teenage years - I remember many people engaging in exactly this kind of ‘deception’ in order to woo. One person I knew used to tell every girl he met that he was a professional footballer – and, as amazing as it might seem, I think some believed it! I have it on good authority that even young ladies have been known to tell a porky or two while chatting to a potential beau.
If any single young men out there were considering travelling to Israel in the near future might I respectfully suggest that you are very careful what you say and who you say it to. The last thing you would want is claim to be from London when you are in fact from Winkleton-on-sea, or that you are athletic and energetic when you are in fact an asthmatic dominoes player, or that you have a mountain of money when you have in fact spent all the money. You might end up in court with very serious charges against you.
The Other
Apparently the news folk were in a bit of a tizzy about today’s various announcements regarding withdrawal from Afghanistan. I wonder if they were short of news – because it seemed perfectly clear to me. But time and again I heard some journalist ask something along the lines of: “Are we going to withdraw our forces by 2015, or is it dependent on the situation? You can’t have it both ways.”
I was left feeling pretty nonplussed by these odd comments. I suppose it was mostly driven by Labour, who are so desperate to find policy targets to shoot at that they are now inventing the most improbable challenges – apparently just to hear the sound of their own voices. The BBC, of course, is always happy to oblige.
What I got from the announcement was this: We want to have troops out by 2015. We expect to have troops our by 2015. It is our sincere ambition to have troops out by 2015. But because wars have a surprising way of developing in directions you can’t always guess in advance – we wont absolutely promise it.
This seems reassuring and patently sensible to me. I pondered why the Labour party would struggle with the simple concept that there is a goal which we expect to meet – but that we wouldn’t sign a name in blood on the document because we recognise that situations can change suddenly. And then I remembered that they are the Labour Party and trying to puzzle out their thought patterns is like trying to get into the head of the guy on the bridge in Edvard Munch’s “The Scream.” You have to share their strange world to have any chance at all. Oh – and don’t forget - They Spent All The Money.
5 Responses to “This, That & The Other (Reprise)”
C'llr 10 Achievement Awards
UK Councillor Blogs Top 30
UK Councillor Blogs Top 30
UK Politics Blogs Top 200
UK Right Blogs Top 100
UK Tory Blogs Top 100
Wikio
THIS
According to the papers and TV Nick didn’t perform very well at PM questions but I agree with you about Labour’s childish responses – Jack Straw has been there under false pretences for a long time
THAT
there is one sure way of a woman finding out if a man is Jewish before intercourse by the way, or at least evidence sufficient to ask the question.
I remember in my early days in sales, going to gigs and things when working away from home I always ysed the chat up line that I travelled in ladies underwear – that usually got a laugh at least.
THE OTHER
Agree totally – talk about making mountains out of molehills. The media are so petty.
It’s also perfectly reasonable to pull our troops out gradually, starting from next year as the Afghans start to take over. Let them shoot their own people if they want to but not their so called allies.
Whether they’ve been worth fighting for and losing our young men’s lives is a different argument of course.
While the intent of the Afghan strategy was pretty reasonable, i.e. putting pressure on the Afghan government to stand on their own two feet because NATO forces won’t be there forever while not providing a definitive exit date which would encourage the Taliban – the problems came in the poor explanation of that strategy between the comments of Fox, Cameron and Clegg over two days. Each was slightly different in their explanation, suggesting a little confusion that had to be cleared up by Cameron the following day. My criticism was one of poor presentation and this is really a topic where they shouldn’t put a foot wrong. Mind you he later slipped up and said that the UK was, “the junior partner in 1940 when we were fighting the Nazis.” It would be December 1941 before Hitler declared war on the US. I think this is at least as amusing as the “saving the world” slip up made by Gordon Brown.
Reg,
Circumcision is not limited to Jewish males, hence her confusion:
“For the majority of Muslims, circumcision is seen as an introduction to the Islamic faith and a sign of belonging.
In Islam there is no fixed age for circumcision. The age at which it is performed varies depending on family, region and country.
The preferred age is often seven although some Muslims are circumcised as early as the seventh day after birth and as late as puberty.”
I bow to your superior knowledge Adam. Never having had my willy tampered with I wouldn’t know about these things. I do know that Muslims practise female circumcision of course, which is even more difficult to contemplate than the male version even if both are considered by man to be God’s law!
I happen to believe that a loving God would never recommend such disgusting practices.
Hello, I love your website. This is a great site and I wanted to post a comment to tell you, great job!
Good Day,
Terisa